The Charlies: Charlotte, DeCarlos, Kirk, and (from the wayback machine) Hebdo of France, Stuart of MA, and Manson of CA.
Are you enjoying the race war/national disintegration psyop? Me neither, and I absolutely can't be bothered trying to convince those who, for psychological reasons mostly, choose to subscribe to the various absurd Charlie themed fictions that are now saturating the legacy and alt perception management platforms like so many fresh cow pies in a pasture. As I strongly suggest in this AI epistle, one's default position regarding any and all *tell a vision* promotions should be that they are soup to nuts fictions. The Overton Window stooges of which there are a seemingly inexhaustible supply, will engage in every possible ploy to get us to buy in. After all, the whole bag of marbles rests on our acceptance of their foundational falsehoods, which in the case of this most recent iteration of the "Charlies" is that, on August 22nd, a young, very blonde, Ukrainian woman riding a local metro train in Charlotte, North Carolina, died as the result of having her neck slashed by a, very black, man whose first name is DeCarlos. This bit of theatre was followed yesterday by the alleged assassination of a young(ish) "right wing" activist named Charlie Kirk who is alleged to have been shot in the neck by a rifle wielding avowed "leftist." In truth of fact, they don't care what version of the plethora of "they were murdered" narratives you pick. Some of the stories will be deliberately implausible, even downright absurd and idiotic. Other ones will seem quite reasonable by comparison. This is a tactic whose purpose is to entice us to choose one of the narratives, because, in the end, that's all they need. As such, they will offer up a seemingly wide array of choices that all have one thing in common, a false foundational premise.
Repudiating a foundational premise fatally undermines the promoter's ability to justify the imposition of whatever appalling assault on good sense, decency, etc. they seek to enact. "There is no replication competent zoonotic or lab created pathogen ravaging mankind. So, no, I won't cower inside my home while my life is ruined. Nor will I will double mask and stand six feet apart from the next person in line at the grocery store. Nor will I have myself triple jabbed with an experimental medical cocktail. Nor will I engage in any other asinine act of self harm in response to what is a non existent threat." "No, the candidates are not adversarial. They are LARPing teammates, despite their (piss poor) attempts at pretending that they are mortal enemies of one another. So, no, I don't consent to being governed by whatever mendacious cad is declared the winner of the latest sham election."
Have I been clear enough? I really hope so. Stand well outside the Overton Window, and remain there, because the quality of your life, even your life itself, depends on it.
This is a very astute and admirably concise explanation of how they set up the Overton Window to support some complete fiction. Allow a furious debate that obscures the fact that the arguments have the effect of supporting a false premise.
ReplyDelete