I Don't Believe (in) Spooks

The infamous figure, Ghislaine Maxwell, has stated that at no time did she ever hear or see Donald Trump do or say anything "inappropriate" when the two were operating in each other's orbit, and, most pertinently, when both were operating within the orbit of the even more infamous, Jeffrey Epstein.  I don't know exactly what Ms. Maxwell meant by inappropriate since no one seems to have tried to definitively pin down that detail.

As it happens, it's something like common knowledge that, in the midst of the 2016 Presidential campaign, Donald Trump was recorded making the astoundingly vulgar and self incriminating claim/admission that "you can grab them (females) by the pussy"-and with impunity at that, if, as seemed to be understood, one possessed a Trump like level of celebrity status-so, the notion that an adherence to propriety has ever been the remit of The Donald heavily strains credulity, at least for those who take at face value what perception management platforms have told us to believe far too many times to count.

Of course one should be mindful of the high likelihood that Ms. Maxwell is an intelligence operative/state asset, just as her infamous father was, as Ms. Maxwell has confessed. Now, typically, intel operatives are in the business of full time deceit towards all but a very select few, so one has to ask: Just what are Ms. Maxwell's handlers expecting to achieve via the testimony of someone who's almost certainly part of the intel community herself, and, who, even if she isn't, will be perceived to be by just abut everyone concerned? What are those behind this performance expecting to achieve by a claim that, as it happens, goes very much against what many believe-with a kind of religious conviction-is in keeping with the behavior and character of the sitting POTUS?


My answer may surprise you, if, that is, you aren't familiar with my particular way of putting things together. My view is that, first and foremost, those behind this theatrical want us to (continue to) believe that what I think is a very important long running psy-op is something else, and the single best way to keep us firmly in the grip of this fiction is to create a great argument over competing claims about the nature of said fiction. "What do you mean President Pussy Grab didn't do anything inappropriate? That's absurd on the face." The foundational falsehood that must be protected with respect to the Esptein/Maxwell saga is that it's a tale of wanton corruption and depravity that involves key uni-party players. It's not, in my view, but they really want us to think so, and to think that a massive coverup is ongoing. The architects of the Overton Window are good at what they do. Well, they are until one realizes that their bread and butter is colossal 24/7 deception. Remember: There's absolutely no reason to have a real war, assassination, political scandal, school shooting, terrorist attack, pandemic, etc, if an astro turf one will do just as well, and, as has been proven over and over, it generally does.